Kllisre X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardKllisre X79  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200606
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 31 '22 at 02:38
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2640 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
62.4% Good
Memory 79.2
1-Core 69.8
2-Core 136
58% 94.8 Pts
4-Core 247
8-Core 411
40% 329 Pts
64-Core 515
32% 515 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380X-$120
CLim: 990 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.1
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.9% Below average
Lighting 46
Reflection 46.2
Parallax 66.9
38% 53 fps
MRender 44.3
Gravity 47.5
Splatting 32.2
33% 41.3 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
P3-256 256GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW201105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 164 0.8 79 0.9 88 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.1% Poor
Read 83.5
Write 3.3
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 65.6
9% 39.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 28
4K Mixed 10.2
29% 13 MB/s
DQ Read 93.3
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 14.3
55% 117 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 98%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
92GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 65 64 63 64 65 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 91.7
Write 90.7
Mixed 58.8
SusWrite 63.4
56% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 60%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
15GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 32 29 34 29 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Read 69.5
Write 74.5
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 31.6
42% 57.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 69%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 16GB
10GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 4.7 6.2 7.7 6.5 6.5 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
8.29% Terrible
Read 25.3
Write 11.5
Mixed 10.5
SusWrite 5.9
15% 13.3 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 2.4
124% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.29%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C HMT151R7BFR4C HMT151R7TFR4C HMT151R7TFR4C 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
44.1% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 14.3
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 8.7
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 317 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Kllisre X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $198
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback