Performance Results


Gaming 109% UFO	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 127% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	247% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Asus Pro WS X299 SAGE II (all builds)
Memory	243.1 GB free of 256 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210713
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Mar 23 '22 at 14:09
Run Duration	290 Seconds
Run User	EUR-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-10940X 1,827 User benchmarks, average bench 86% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	84.3% Excellent	Memory 74.8 1-Core 128 2-Core 245 82% 149 Pts	4-Core 503 8-Core 834 82% 669 Pts	64-Core 2,356 146% 2,356 Pts
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 84.3% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340 442,467 User benchmarks, average bench 128% Nvidia(10DE 2489) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79 Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	124% Outstanding	Lighting 169 Reflection 172 Parallax 160 138% 167 fps	MRender 182 Gravity 133 Splatting 116 114% 143 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 136%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme EnmotusP200HEQ 900GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 204% 652GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1664 1641 1675 1675 1659 1702 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	247% Outstanding	Read 1,187 Write 1,671 Mixed 1158 SusWrite 1,669 322% 1,421 MB/s	4K Read 41 4K Write 168 4K Mixed 63.2 232% 90.8 MB/s	DQ Read 743 DQ Write 436 DQ Mixed 687 485% 622 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 247% Great: 287%
Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP2000GM30013 2TB 2,028 User benchmarks, average bench 459% 2TB free Firmware: SU6SM001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1989 2012 2066 2050 2022 2029 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	340% Outstanding	Read 1,581 Write 1,924 Mixed 1,783 SusWrite 2028 414% 1,829 MB/s	4K Read 57.4 4K Write 242 4K Mixed 90.4 331% 130 MB/s	DQ Read 1,337 DQ Write 979 DQ Mixed 1,158 865% 1,158 MB/s
Poor: 277% ↑ This bench: 340% Great: 604%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 8TB 394 User benchmarks, average bench 560% 7.5TB free Firmware: 1.0.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 689 669 685 688 670 694 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	148% Outstanding	Read 1,016 Write 798 Mixed 629 SusWrite 682 175% 781 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 99.3 4K Mixed 35.7 137% 53.5 MB/s	DQ Read 473 DQ Write 610 DQ Mixed 518 398% 534 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 148% Great: 867%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK32GX4M1D3000C16 8x31.9GB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 142% 8 of 8 slots used 255GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	109% Outstanding	MC Read 37.4 MC Write 57.1 MC Mixed 38.7 127% 44.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 21.6 SC Mixed 9.7 37% 13 GB/s	Latency 90.8 44% 90.8 ns
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 174%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 176%

UFO

Desktop 93%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 222%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	8x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	7x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $169Bench 416%, 138,083 samples	4x

RAM
M378A4G43AB2-CWE 8x31.9GBSamsungBench 134%, 35 samples	4x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBCorsairBench 89%, 5,810 samples	4x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBG.SKILL $139Bench 95%, 14,506 samples	3x

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $2,031

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16