QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	30% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	44.4 GB free of 48 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 23 '22 at 01:27
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	30%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD EPYC 153 User benchmarks, average bench 74% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	51% Above average	Memory 53.8 1-Core 65.7 2-Core 171 52% 96.7 Pts	4-Core 286 8-Core 240 36% 263 Pts	64-Core 308 19% 308 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.79 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30% Below average	Lighting 38.6 Reflection 40.4 Parallax 42.2 32% 40.4 fps	MRender 37.7 Gravity 37.8 Splatting 26.9 27% 34.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$37 33,719 User benchmarks, average bench 145% 196GB free (System drive) Firmware: AAXA4103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 437 407 413 379 377 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	120% Outstanding	Read 1,357 Write 466 Mixed 450 SusWrite 401 147% 669 MB/s	4K Read 25.8 4K Write 64.6 4K Mixed 27.1 108% 39.2 MB/s	DQ Read 227 DQ Write 134 DQ Mixed 219 153% 193 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 216%
Samsung MZ1LB3T8HMLA-00007 4TB 57 User benchmarks, average bench 245% 1TB free Firmware: EDB7202Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 511 579 577 583 591 592 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	132% Outstanding	Read 701 Write 602 Mixed 609 SusWrite 572 140% 621 MB/s	4K Read 31.5 4K Write 68.7 4K Mixed 45.3 142% 48.5 MB/s	DQ Read 649 DQ Write 451 DQ Mixed 392 335% 497 MB/s
Poor: 137% ↑ This bench: 132% Great: 291%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 3x16GB 71 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 3 of 3 slots used 48GB DIMM RAM Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	48.7% Average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 19.9 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 16.8 SC Mixed 24 53% 18.5 GB/s	Latency 147 27% 147 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 128%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 608 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	20x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	37x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	29x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	28x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

RAM
1x16GBQEMUBench 91%, 3,887 samples	140x
1x8GBQEMUBench 78%, 5,342 samples	73x
1x12GBQEMUBench 78%, 4,175 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16