Asrock Z690 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 119%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics55.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive333% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 91% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
MotherboardAsrock Z690 Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kolorów,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 19 '22 at 19:35
Run Duration295 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU1%
CPU Throttled 91%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12600K-$163
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Memory 88
1-Core 208
2-Core 413
123% 236 Pts
4-Core 797
8-Core 1,371
131% 1,084 Pts
64-Core 1,842
114% 1,842 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 119%
Great: 117%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
Gigabyte(1458 371A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.3% Above average
Lighting 68.1
Reflection 75.6
Parallax 68.6
56% 70.8 fps
MRender 64.7
Gravity 69.1
Splatting 67.4
55% 67.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
315GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 929 1556 773 729 763 674 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
333% Outstanding
Read 2393
Write 1,893
Mixed 1,642
SusWrite 904
381% 1,708 MB/s
4K Read 71.8
4K Write 200
4K Mixed 95.8
337% 122 MB/s
DQ Read 1,882
DQ Write 1632
DQ Mixed 1,733
1,306% 1,749 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 333%
Great: 355%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
296GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2080 717 581 591 591 590 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
314% Outstanding
Read 2,204
Write 2,055
Mixed 1,480
SusWrite 858
369% 1,649 MB/s
4K Read 52.3
4K Write 211
4K Mixed 85.9
301% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,881
DQ Write 1,742
DQ Mixed 1,773
1,341% 1,799 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 314%
Great: 340%
GOODRAM 480GB
82GB free
Firmware: SAFM01.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 177 429 32 407 127 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 405
Write 440
Mixed 316
SusWrite 222
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 61.7
4K Mixed 21.8
96% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 55.3
DQ Mixed 71
55% 76.3 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 130%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$60
563GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 129 128 120 125 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 127
Write 123
Mixed 86.9
SusWrite 117
84% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2E3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2E3200C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 41
MC Write 41.6
MC Mixed 39.1
116% 40.6 GB/s
SC Read 28.1
SC Write 45.8
SC Mixed 35.8
104% 36.6 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 113%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z690 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 966 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 161%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 164%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z690 Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $661
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback