Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H67-I

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-I  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 18 '22 at 05:57
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1245 V2-$315
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 95.1
1-Core 98.4
2-Core 185
75% 126 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 490
50% 403 Pts
64-Core 488
30% 488 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD P4000 (Server 1.25 GHz)
Asus(1043 844D) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2618
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
3.42% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 3.1
3% 3.1 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 5.3
4% 4.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.42%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB 240GB
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW201219
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 170 323 338 338 339 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.6% Below average
Read 244
Write 12
Mixed 13.2
SusWrite 253
29% 131 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 6.9
4K Mixed 5.9
28% 8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 90%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$80
364GB free
Firmware: MN6OA5C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 97 96 98 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 105
Write 108
Mixed 63.6
SusWrite 97.5
69% 93.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
54.9% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.1
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.6
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 56.8
70% 56.8 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-I Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-I

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $315
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback