Today's hottest deals

Packard EasyNote LM98

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics4.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPackard EasyNote LM98  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard SJV71_CP
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 09 '22 at 16:05
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 370-$167
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 0.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
24% Poor
Memory 39.2
1-Core 17.7
2-Core 35.9
21% 30.9 Pts
4-Core 53.4
8-Core 45
7% 49.2 Pts
64-Core 48.9
3% 48.9 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 24%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6500M
Acer(1025 0517) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
4.22% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 6.4
Parallax 4.6
4% 5.43 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 4
Splatting 5.2
4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.22%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
INTENSO 128GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 54 44 62 90 82 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.9% Below average
Read 202
Write 191
Mixed 189
SusWrite 79.5
37% 165 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 16.6
4K Mixed 14.8
48% 14.9 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 85.2
DQ Mixed 107
81% 110 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5273CH0-YK0 80AD HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
19% Very poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 8
20% 6.87 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 4.6
13% 4.4 GB/s
Latency 206
19% 206 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EasyNote LM98 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote LM98

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $50
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback