Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 81V5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics2.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive153% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 81V5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory5.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200520
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 08 '22 at 05:58
Run Duration415 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 63.7
2-Core 124
43% 93.6 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 385
37% 305 Pts
64-Core 420
26% 420 Pts
Poor: 30% Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Legend(17AA 3808) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.40.46
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.07% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 3.6
2% 2.93 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.63 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 2.07%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 809 627 620 572 588 574 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
153% Outstanding
Read 1,420
Write 1,141
Mixed 958
SusWrite 632
232% 1,038 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 53.1
4K Mixed 40
132% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 460
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 383
280% 370 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 153%
Great: 340%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
7GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 376
Write 324
Mixed 312
75% 338 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 39.9
4K Mixed 29.7
100% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 171
128% 171 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
WD Elements 2621 3TB
3TB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 26 25 27 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 21
Write 24
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 25.7
32% 22.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.4
86% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3260ME78HAF-2666 Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E! 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
23.9% Poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 11.8
25% 8.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 11.6
24% 8.4 GB/s
Latency 637
6% 637 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81V5 Builds (Compare 121 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81V5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $337WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback