Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator G3610

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator G3610  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator G3610
Memory15 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 05 '22 at 13:29
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$173
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 92.5
2-Core 178
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 454
48% 383 Pts
64-Core 456
28% 456 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
MSI(1462 2842) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.98
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
29% Poor
Lighting 33.2
Reflection 33.7
Parallax 44.2
27% 37 fps
MRender 45.1
Gravity 41.6
Splatting 35.7
33% 40.8 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 29%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 50 52 50 53 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
36% Below average
Read 438
Write 51.5
Mixed 99.2
SusWrite 48
34% 159 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 4.3
56% 13.1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 36%
Great: 108%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 1TB
453GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 212 219 228 234 233 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 497
Write 201
Mixed 246
SusWrite 219
64% 291 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 33.1
4K Mixed 23
77% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 166
126% 172 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 382%
ST2000DM 008-2FR102 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 65 51 87 74 63 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 156
Write 65.7
Mixed 66.9
SusWrite 68.7
107% 89.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.4
69% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 79%
ST3000DM 001-1ER166 3TB
2TB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 165 178 160 174 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 187
Write 156
Mixed 78
SusWrite 166
192% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 M378B5773DH0-CH9 M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B1G73DB0-CK0 20GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.3% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.2
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator G3610 Builds (Compare 362 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Acer Predator G3610

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $332
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback