Sintrones AMB-5210G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics74.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive76.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSintrones AMB-5210G  (all builds)
MotherboardSINTRONES AMB-5210G
Memory60.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 03 '22 at 14:02
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900TE
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Memory 72.9
1-Core 56.1
2-Core 112
50% 80.4 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 446
40% 336 Pts
64-Core 738
46% 738 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 3000
Device(144A 4300) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
74.7% Very good
Lighting 87.7
Reflection 96.4
Parallax 90.7
72% 91.6 fps
MRender 131
Gravity 81.8
Splatting 90.3
81% 101 fps
Poor: 64%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 75%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Renice X5A 253GB
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0810B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 332 343 341 341 341 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.7% Very good
Read 478
Write 341
Mixed 306
SusWrite 337
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 52.4
4K Mixed 24.3
85% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 181
153% 219 MB/s
SSD 512GB 512GB
217GB free
Firmware: 1101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 43 43 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
17% Very poor
Read 34.1
Write 34.9
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 42.3
8% 36 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 14.4
4K Mixed 10.1
39% 12.2 MB/s
DQ Read 26.6
DQ Write 24.5
DQ Mixed 14.9
14% 22 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 17%
Great: 211%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown W-MEM29S32GWT 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.9% Good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 22.2
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 14.3
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 94.9
42% 94.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AMB-5210G Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Sintrones AMB-5210G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback