Today's hottest deals

Packard ONETWO M3700

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemPackard ONETWO M3700  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard ONETWO M3700
Memory2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '22 at 15:22
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium T4400-$110
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Memory 61.2
1-Core 34
2-Core 67.9
36% 54.4 Pts
4-Core 66.4
8-Core 67.2
9% 66.8 Pts
64-Core 66.8
4% 66.8 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Acer(1025 0275) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2302
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.42% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.47 fps
MRender 0.5
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 0.8
1% 0.73 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.42%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$36
514GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 75 84 77 82 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 98.3
Write 91
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 77.6
60% 81.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 62%
Generic- SD/MMC 32GB
4GB free, PID 0109
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 4.8 4.8 6.4 6.5 7.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
4.62% Terrible
Read 17
Write 7.5
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 6.4
12% 9.65 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 1.8
73% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.62%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HYMP125S64CP8-Y5 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2 667 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.2% Very poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 3.8
12% 4.33 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.17 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ONETWO M3700 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard ONETWO M3700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback