Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 9.79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	28.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP 530 Notebook PC(KD085AA#ABE) (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 30D5
Memory	1.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20080318
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 24 '22 at 22:55
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	38%

PC Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron M 440 159 User benchmarks, average bench 25% U10, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	9.79% Terrible	Memory 16.9 1-Core 16.1 2-Core 16 11% 16.3 Pts	4-Core 16.3 8-Core 17.8 2% 17 Pts	64-Core 16.1 1% 16.1 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.79% Great: 32%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSDPR-CL100-120-G3 120GB 1,092 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 98GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFMP1.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 106 110 100 100 40 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.8% Poor	Read 91.4 Write 78.5 Mixed 81.1 SusWrite 93.4 19% 86.1 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 25.1 4K Mixed 16.1 55% 18.4 MB/s	DQ Read 51.2 DQ Write 52.3 DQ Mixed 52.6 39% 52 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	6.09% Terrible	MC Read 1.4 MC Write 2 MC Mixed 2.2 5% 1.87 GB/s	SC Read 3.3 SC Write 1.5 SC Mixed 1.6 6% 2.13 GB/s	Latency 345 12% 345 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.09% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16