Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire V3-771

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire V3-771  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 VA70_HC
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '22 at 17:02
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 87.4
2-Core 144
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 428
48% 376 Pts
64-Core 427
26% 427 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Acer(1025 0686) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2653
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 7
Parallax 1.4
3% 3.97 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.97 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 160GB (2009)-$23
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 53 53 54 54 55 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 58.6
Write 10.2
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 53.7
26% 36 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
86% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 36%
Toshiba MK7559GSXP 750GB-$118
115GB free
Firmware: GN00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 74 76 77 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 62.6
Write 70.9
Mixed 19.6
SusWrite 75.9
42% 57.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NS-CG 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
51.1% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 16.3
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 74.8
53% 74.8 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V3-771 Builds (Compare 835 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V3-771

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $77
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $337WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback