Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210825
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '22 at 13:30
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
11th Gen Intel Core i5-1145G7E
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Memory 60.3
1-Core 87.7
2-Core 175
60% 108 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 377
42% 331 Pts
64-Core 410
25% 410 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS128GMTE452T 128GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 52B9T7OA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 114 95 104 125 142 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
117% Outstanding
Read 1,273
Write 350
Mixed 128
SusWrite 118
100% 467 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 45
163% 61.7 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 160
131% 186 MB/s
Poor: 93%
This bench: 117%
Great: 117%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 32GB
21GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 8.1 10 9.8 46 58 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 147
Write 52.6
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 24.1
84% 73.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.6
151% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
InnoDisk Corporation M4S0-AGS1OCSJ 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.1% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 11.7
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 11.7
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 15,305 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback