Toshiba Satellite A70

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba Satellite A70  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA EDW10
Memory0.5 GB free of 1.5 GB @ 0.2 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20040910
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '22 at 18:23
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User SLV-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Mobile Intel Pentium 4 3.20GHz
NWD, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.5% Below average
Memory 75.9
1-Core 11.2
2-Core 22.8
30% 36.6 Pts
4-Core 23.1
8-Core 20.7
3% 21.9 Pts
64-Core 28.1
2% 28.1 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK 512GB 512GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0128A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 37 33 43 37 43 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.7% Poor
Read 48.2
Write 37.1
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 37.8
31% 41.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 7.8
4K Mixed 7.6
1,139% 6.33 MB/s
Seagate Expansion 1TB
195GB free, PID 231a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 9.8 9.6 10 9.9 9.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
8.52% Terrible
Read 9.3
Write 5.4
Mixed 8.4
SusWrite 9.8
11% 8.23 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.3
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.52%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1GB
null MHz
512, 1024 MB
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
7.04% Terrible
MC Read 1.7
MC Write 1.6
MC Mixed 1.4
4% 1.57 GB/s
SC Read 0.4
SC Write 0.3
SC Mixed 0.1
1% 0.27 GB/s
Latency 88.5
45% 88.5 ns
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.04%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback