Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 139%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 149%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive80.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '22 at 00:44
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core (Skylake, IBRS, no TSX)
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 79.1
1-Core 182
2-Core 311
103% 191 Pts
4-Core 719
8-Core 1,146
115% 932 Pts
64-Core 2,188
135% 2,188 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 107%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$399
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
130% Outstanding
Lighting 181
Reflection 176
Parallax 182
147% 180 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 136
Splatting 117
117% 148 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 130%
Great: 136%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 416 407 409 407 410 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 405
Write 404
Mixed 351
SusWrite 412
89% 393 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 45.3
4K Mixed 30.6
99% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 164
128% 176 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM RAM
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
98% Outstanding
MC Read 36.7
MC Write 35.4
MC Mixed 34.1
101% 35.4 GB/s
SC Read 23.9
SC Write 39.1
SC Mixed 29
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 98%
Great: 231%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 621 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback