Today's hottest deals

HP 500-076ea

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics32.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 500-076ea  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2AE0
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141111
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '22 at 12:10
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5500 APU-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Memory 59.2
1-Core 55.4
2-Core 81.3
42% 65.3 Pts
4-Core 81.4
8-Core 141
14% 111 Pts
64-Core 148
9% 148 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32.3% Below average
Lighting 42.1
Reflection 40.5
Parallax 39
34% 40.5 fps
MRender 37.7
Gravity 42
Splatting 27.4
28% 35.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS120GSSD220S 120GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VD0R0181
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 71 69 65 57 40 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.3% Average
Read 197
Write 100
Mixed 255
SusWrite 81
36% 158 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 47.7
4K Mixed 23.3
85% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 95.3
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 156
108% 132 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 96%
Corsair Force 3 120GB-$109
9GB free
Firmware: 5.02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 90 82 93 84 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
42% Average
Read 127
Write 120
Mixed 132
SusWrite 86.1
26% 116 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 46.5
4K Mixed 23.6
84% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 112
88% 123 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 42%
Great: 61%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
90GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 87 89 86 87 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 68.6
Write 77.7
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 86.6
55% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.2
90% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 67%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$53
22GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 77 88 74 72 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 83.9
Write 88
Mixed 54.4
SusWrite 79.5
56% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$21
19GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 71 72 73 73 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 70
Write 67.1
Mixed 51.2
SusWrite 72
48% 65.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 69%
WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 500GB
97GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 53 55 53 55 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
24.3% Poor
Read 30.3
Write 30.4
Mixed 26
SusWrite 53.9
26% 35.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1333KLU-2G Samsung M378B1G73BH0-CK0 Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 16GB
1333, 1600, 1600, 1333 MHz
2048, 8192, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.1% Very poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 8.5
20% 6.87 GB/s
SC Read 2
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 2.7
8% 2.8 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-076ea Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP 500-076ea

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback