Asus 1025C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus 1025C  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK 1025C
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display800 x 600 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130816
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 31 '22 at 22:09
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N2800
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Memory 51.9
1-Core 7.7
2-Core 14.5
21% 24.7 Pts
4-Core 25
8-Core 24.9
3% 25 Pts
64-Core 24.5
2% 24.5 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
292GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 79 79 80 80 80 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 80.5
Write 78.3
Mixed 45.4
SusWrite 79
52% 70.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 47%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
11GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 5.6 6.6 6.2 6.3 6.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
7.05% Terrible
Read 24.5
Write 6.2
Mixed 9.7
SusWrite 6.2
13% 11.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 1
62% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.05%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-130.A00L 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.4% Very poor
MC Read 4.9
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 3.5
12% 4.27 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 4.1
11% 3.77 GB/s
Latency 154
26% 154 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 13%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 1025C Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Asus 1025C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $490Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback