Intel X99

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics81.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive167% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardIntel X99  (all builds)
Memory21.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200902
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 31 '22 at 14:24
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680R v4
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 60.6
2-Core 122
55% 88.2 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 475
42% 359 Pts
64-Core 2,108
130% 2,108 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.1.2
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.4% Excellent
Lighting 105
Reflection 102
Parallax 155
86% 121 fps
MRender 90
Gravity 110
Splatting 74.9
73% 91.5 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
426GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4L2QEXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 723 831 770 587 585 592 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
167% Outstanding
Read 1,188
Write 1002
Mixed 973
SusWrite 681
216% 961 MB/s
4K Read 49.7
4K Write 70.7
4K Mixed 56.1
185% 58.8 MB/s
DQ Read 565
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 432
326% 442 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 167%
Great: 296%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
25GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 490
Write 455
Mixed 349
96% 432 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 56.5
4K Mixed 38.2
132% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 174
150% 227 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35
56GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 132 132 117 111 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 489
Write 450
Mixed 338
SusWrite 147
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 58.8
4K Mixed 40.1
136% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 304
235% 323 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 110%
Drevo X1 PRO SSD 128GB
0GB free
Firmware: Q0517A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 494
Write 391
Mixed 23.4
66% 303 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 12.9
4K Mixed 1
40% 11.8 MB/s
DQ Read 82.6
DQ Write 16.6
DQ Mixed 16.5
21% 38.6 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 82%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
652GB free
Firmware: CV27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 167 168 170 172 171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Read 153
Write 172
Mixed 85.7
SusWrite 170
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A1G40EB1-CRC 4x8GB
4 of 24 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
57.4% Above average
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 19
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 13.8
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Builds (Compare 2,352 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback