Today's hottest deals

Asus H170M-E D3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics24.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H170M-E D3  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180222
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 30 '22 at 12:31
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$62
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 79.2
1-Core 98.2
2-Core 167
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 295
45% 326 Pts
64-Core 379
23% 379 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 652 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.10.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.1% Poor
Lighting 31
Reflection 27.9
Parallax 44.8
25% 34.6 fps
MRender 23.3
Gravity 35.6
Splatting 22.6
22% 27.2 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500240G 240GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 003056RA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 44 0 0 21 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 369
Write 394
Mixed 316
SusWrite 66.5
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 35.2
107% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 141
122% 184 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 89%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 750GB-$55
165GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 59 84 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 39.5
Write 70
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 65.3
42% 57.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
57.3% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 18.4
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 14.3
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 82.1
49% 82.1 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170M-E D3 Builds (Compare 424 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H170M-E D3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback