Chuwi Hi10 Go

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemChuwi Hi10 Go  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory3.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1200 x 1920 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211209
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateJan 29 '22 at 12:20
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
43.1% Average
Memory 43.7
1-Core 28.5
2-Core 149
38% 73.7 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 242
33% 244 Pts
64-Core 182
11% 182 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1003
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4.49% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 7.2
Parallax 5.4
4% 5.83 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 7.7
6% 6.53 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.49%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
USB DISK 2.0 8GB
4GB free, PID 4300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 5.4 3.8 5 5.2 3.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.89% Terrible
Read 14
Write 4
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 4.4
6% 6.03 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.89%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 2x3GB
2 of 2 slots used
6GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
39.8% Below average
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 15.1
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 7.4
22% 7.87 GB/s
Latency 186
22% 186 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback