Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	38% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.

System	VMware, VMware Virtual Platform
Motherboard	Intel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory	1.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	918 x 947 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20201112
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 20 '22 at 23:11
Run Duration	218 Seconds
Run User	HRV-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-7020U 8 User benchmarks, average bench 29% CPU #000, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Memory 16.1 1-Core 48.5 2-Core 45 21% 36.5 Pts	4-Core 47.8 8-Core 44.2 6% 46 Pts	64-Core 10.9 1% 10.9 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Vmware, VMware Virtual S 54GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 35 34 33 34 33 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	38% Below average	Read 360 Write 287 Mixed 376 SusWrite 37.5 59% 265 MB/s	4K Read 20.2 4K Write 18.4 4K Mixed 19.5 65% 19.4 MB/s	DQ Read 24 DQ Write 20.1 DQ Mixed 19.3 15% 21.1 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 82%
Vmware, VMware Virtual S 54GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 50GB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 34 34 34 33 33 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	59.2% Above average	Read 165 Write 123 Mixed 137 SusWrite 38.1 87% 116 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 7.1 4K Mixed 0.8 354% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 128 slots used 2GB DIMM DRAM Relative performance (0^th percentile)	3.1% Terrible	MC Read 0.7 MC Write 1 MC Mixed 1 3% 0.9 GB/s	SC Read 0.2 SC Write 1 SC Mixed 0.2 1% 0.47 GB/s	Latency 351 11% 351 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 3.1% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,145x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,060x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	829x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	458x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	432x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325