Today's hottest deals

Gateway NE56R

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemGateway NE56R  (all builds)
MotherboardGateway EG50_HC_HR
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 16 '22 at 05:29
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium B950
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
48.2% Average
Memory 79.4
1-Core 54
2-Core 81.7
48% 71.7 Pts
4-Core 103
8-Core 97.8
14% 100 Pts
64-Core 105
6% 105 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Acer(1025 0649) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.98% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 0.7
1% 1 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 2.4
1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.98%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK5059GSXP 500GB-$50
358GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GN00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 38 25 21 25 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 21.2
Write 17.7
Mixed 19.4
SusWrite 31
16% 22.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
28.6% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 8.6
26% 9.13 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 8.5
26% 9.07 GB/s
Latency 81.6
49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NE56R Builds (Compare 216 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Gateway NE56R

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback