Today's hottest deals

Sony VPCEB44EN

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemSony VPCEB44EN  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory1.9 GB free of 6 GB
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101006
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '22 at 03:09
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core Q 720
N/A, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
61% Good
Memory 92.2
1-Core 68.7
2-Core 117
60% 92.5 Pts
4-Core 169
8-Core 214
24% 192 Pts
64-Core 214
13% 214 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 61%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470
Device(0000 0000) 512MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.22% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 3
Parallax 1.9
1% 2.1 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 1
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.67 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.22%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK3265GSXN 320GB
278GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GH012H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 69 70 49 44 55 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 76.2
Write 78.8
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 61.2
43% 59.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
41.2% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 13.2
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 11.4
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 63.7
63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VPCEB44EN Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Sony VPCEB44EN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback