Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FB_X512FB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FB_X512FB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512FB
Memory7.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210129
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 09 '22 at 00:35
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU7%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Memory 85.9
1-Core 113
2-Core 230
80% 143 Pts
4-Core 418
8-Core 522
60% 470 Pts
64-Core 520
32% 520 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Asus(1043 1DFE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
4.65% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 10.4
Parallax 7.3
5% 7.93 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 9.3
Splatting 0.3
4% 5.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.65%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3500105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 398 396 353 368 376 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
75% Very good
Read 330
Write 276
Mixed 294
SusWrite 380
72% 320 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 76.9
4K Mixed 25.1
92% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 97.8
112% 186 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 75%
Great: 100%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
26GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 7.4 8.4 8.7 8.5 8.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
7.6% Terrible
Read 16.4
Write 9.7
Mixed 10.2
SusWrite 7.8
14% 11 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.1
44% 1 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.6%
Great: 18%
WD Elements 10B8 1.5TB
890GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 36 37 37 36 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Read 29
Write 27.6
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 36.6
41% 29.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E2 12GB
2400, 3200 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
49% Average
MC Read 19
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 12.9
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 16.6
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 49%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FB_X512FB Builds (Compare 133 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FB_X512FB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback