| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Boot Drive | 57.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | HP Z400 Workstation (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0B4Ch |
| Memory | 5.6 GB free of 8.00195 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20101029 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 03 '22 at 13:28 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | AUT-User |
| Background CPU | 40% |
PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon W3550
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
68.1%
Good
|
60% 98.3 Pts
|
43% 319 Pts
|
20% 322 Pts
|
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 93 94 90 102 150 MB/s
|
57.2%
Above average
|
41% 182 MB/s
|
110% 36.4 MB/s
|
148% 198 MB/s
|
|
Jmicron Tech 256GB
216GB free
Firmware: 0208
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 20 19 19 21 30 MB/s
|
15.7%
Very poor
|
20% 27.3 MB/s
|
1,319% 7.7 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown ID:80 CE M378B5173EB0-CK0 ID:80 CE M378B5173EB0-CK0 42GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 34816 MB
|
21.3%
Poor
|
18% 6.33 GB/s
|
19% 6.7 GB/s
|
51% 78.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,326 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Z400 Workstation
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon W3520Intel $230Bench 63%, 6,508 samples | 569x |
| Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples | 536x |
| Xeon W3565IntelBench 67%, 7,121 samples | 489x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 273x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 156x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 137x |
| SSD |
|
|---|---|
| A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 136x |
| 850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 73x |
| A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples | 66x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $258 |