Mediacom SmartBook 14 FullHD - SB14UC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 10%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemMediacom SmartBook 14 FullHD - SB14UC  (all builds)
MotherboardInsyde Type2 - Board Product Name
Memory0.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 07 '17 at 15:14
Run Duration297 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
CHV, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.45 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
22.7% Poor
Memory 35.7
1-Core 16.5
2-Core 31.4
19% 27.9 Pts
4-Core 57
8-Core 63
8% 60 Pts
64-Core 62.4
4% 62.4 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Intel(8086 7270) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.1% Terrible
Lighting 1.23
Reflection 1.69
Parallax 1.62
1% 1.52 fps
MRender 1.52
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 1.96
1% 1.53 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.1%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Generic SA64G SD Card 62GB
48GB free
Firmware: 1.8
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
5.23% Terrible
Read 11.3
Write 5.46
Mixed 7.89
6% 8.21 MB/s
4K Read 4.02
4K Write 0.67
4K Mixed 0.54
240% 1.75 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.23%
Great: 27%
Generic NCard 31GB
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.6
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54% Above average
Read 133
Write 53.2
Mixed 31.8
53% 72.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.31
4K Write 2.51
4K Mixed 1.55
440% 3.12 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.4% Very poor
MC Read 5.3
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 4.7
15% 5.27 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 1.7
7% 2.6 GB/s
Latency 223
18% 223 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback