Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	78.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD PRO A10-8770E R7, 10 COMPUTE CORES 4C+6G 50 User benchmarks, average bench 40% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	49.8% Average	Memory 71 1-Core 52.4 2-Core 99.5 47% 74.3 Pts	4-Core 168 8-Core 168 22% 168 Pts	64-Core 168 10% 168 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 37,078 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Legend(17AA 30FD) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	4.86% Terrible	Lighting 5.63 Reflection 8.92 Parallax 8.91 5% 7.82 fps	MRender 4.86 Gravity 7.07 Splatting 7.35 5% 6.42 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.86% Great: 8%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLV256HCHP-000L1 256GB 671 User benchmarks, average bench 130% 218GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5L0QBXV7 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	78.6% Very good	Read 721 Write 292 Mixed 403 104% 472 MB/s	4K Read 27.6 4K Write 48 4K Mixed 18 90% 31.2 MB/s	DQ Read 134 DQ Write 96.9 DQ Mixed 13.8 38% 81.4 MB/s
Poor: 92% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 152%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMSA3260MB78HAF2400 1x8GB 4,115 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.3% Poor	MC Read 12.1 MC Write 7.9 MC Mixed 9.7 28% 9.9 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 7.5 18% 6.23 GB/s	Latency 99.1 40% 99.1 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16