Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 82H8

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive180% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82H8  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210611
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 29 '21 at 18:41
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Gold 7505
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 76.1
1-Core 124
2-Core 217
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 301
40% 298 Pts
64-Core 300
18% 300 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3F9C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9664
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Lighting 11.9
Reflection 12.1
Parallax 15.1
10% 13 fps
MRender 17.2
Gravity 17
Splatting 14.5
13% 16.2 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme UMIS RPJTJ256MEE1OWX 256GB
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.1C0628 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 381 350 337 341 339 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
180% Outstanding
Read 1,542
Write 976
Mixed 991
SusWrite 372
216% 970 MB/s
4K Read 55
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 70.6
236% 80.8 MB/s
DQ Read 638
DQ Write 368
DQ Mixed 327
290% 444 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 180%
Great: 219%
TOSHIBA MK6465GSXN 640GB
405GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 2.3 4 5.3 5.3 5.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
6.85% Terrible
Read 36
Write 2.2
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 4.1
10% 11.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
16% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.85%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 8GB
3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
75.1% Very good
MC Read 23.8
MC Write 34.8
MC Mixed 21.6
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 38
SC Mixed 17.6
69% 24 GB/s
Latency 88.1
45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82H8 Builds (Compare 4,412 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82H8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback