Biostar A58ML

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	27.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Biostar A58ML (all builds)
Memory	11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20151105
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 28 '21 at 10:15
Run Duration	179 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	31%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon X4 845-$50 6,391 User benchmarks, average bench 45% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	32.5% Below average	Memory 34 1-Core 66.6 2-Core 120 40% 73.6 Pts	4-Core 189 8-Core 130 23% 159 Pts	64-Core 46.5 3% 46.5 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.13 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.6% Poor	Lighting 34.8 Reflection 36.7 Parallax 39.9 28% 37.1 fps	MRender 36.1 Gravity 36.4 Splatting 25.8 26% 32.8 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 500GB-$90 17,487 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 85 100 101 92 96 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.7% Below average	Read 154 Write 139 Mixed 94.3 SusWrite 92.2 27% 120 MB/s	4K Read 15.7 4K Write 39.7 4K Mixed 23.7 75% 26.4 MB/s	DQ Read 25 DQ Write 29.1 DQ Mixed 25.5 20% 26.5 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 105%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 523GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 134 168 172 170 142 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	89.8% Excellent	Read 162 Write 166 Mixed 36.6 SusWrite 150 93% 129 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.5 126% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.C16 CT102464BD160B.M16 16GB 68 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	28% Poor	MC Read 10.6 MC Write 7.2 MC Mixed 13.5 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 8.2 19% 6.63 GB/s	Latency 232 17% 232 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A58ML Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A58ML

CPU
A4-6300 APUAMD $51Bench 40%, 10,924 samples	3x
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples	2x
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon HD 7480DAMDBench 2%, 8,289 samples	2x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	1x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	1x

SSD
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	2x
MZ7TE128HMGR-000L2 128GBSamsungBench 60%, 229 samples	1x
850 Evo 120GBSamsung $80Bench 96%, 69,224 samples	1x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBCorsairBench 31%, 11,204 samples	2x
SP004GBLTU160N02 2x4GBUnknownBench 48%, 451 samples	2x
99U5584-005.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 50%, 8,083 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $51

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16