Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire A515-56G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Aspire A515-56G  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Iris_TL
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210831
Uptime1 Days
Run DateDec 24 '21 at 13:43
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 64.3
1-Core 144
2-Core 221
79% 143 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 602
63% 507 Pts
64-Core 601
37% 601 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Acer(1025 1464) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1003
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
11% Very poor
Lighting 18.4
Reflection 26.9
Parallax 20.1
15% 21.8 fps
MRender 11.3
Gravity 1
Splatting 1
3% 4.43 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Netac SSD 256GB
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0707A0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 138 124 170 338 519 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 1,224
Write 765
Mixed 484
SusWrite 231
149% 676 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 43
4K Mixed 8.8
93% 30.3 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 93.5
112% 202 MB/s
Poor: 100%
This bench: 100%
Great: 250%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
323GB free
Firmware: JU002J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 92 90 91 90 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 141
Write 137
Mixed 56.6
SusWrite 91.3
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 0.6
236% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.9% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 9.5
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 9.9
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 116
35% 116 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A515-56G Builds (Compare 1,071 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A515-56G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback