Today's hottest deals

Asrock NUC-TGL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.67% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive27.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock NUC-TGL  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210317
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 17 '21 at 18:42
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Memory 67.1
1-Core 85
2-Core 170
61% 107 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 402
40% 329 Pts
64-Core 451
28% 451 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
ASRock(1849 9A49) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Relative performance (0th percentile)
5.67% Terrible
Lighting 10.2
Reflection 24.7
Parallax 22
8% 19 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 1
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.73 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 5.67%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS64GMTS952T2 64GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02J0T4GB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 53 52 48 61 64 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.9% Poor
Read 145
Write 146
Mixed 72.7
SusWrite 54.6
23% 104 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 22.6
4K Mixed 19.8
50% 17 MB/s
DQ Read 47.9
DQ Write 52.5
DQ Mixed 48.5
37% 49.6 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 59%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 4GB
1GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 5.5 5.3 5.3 5.1 5.3 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
9.65% Terrible
Read 17.2
Write 4
Mixed 8.9
SusWrite 5.2
10% 8.82 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 2.2
145% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.65%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
InnoDisk Corporation M4S0-AGS1OCIK 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.2% Average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 12.4
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 13.4
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NUC-TGL Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock NUC-TGL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $55
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback