Today's hottest deals

HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory10.2 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200220
Uptime22 Days
Run DateDec 16 '21 at 10:55
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$100
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 76.7
1-Core 104
2-Core 206
73% 129 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 406
53% 400 Pts
64-Core 392
24% 392 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 18E7) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.21% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 6.8
3% 4.4 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 5
4% 4.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.21%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 500GB-$66
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 172 249 176 224 190 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 478
Write 440
Mixed 345
SusWrite 218
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 60.8
4K Mixed 38
129% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 270
223% 321 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 117%
Seagate ST31000322CS 1TB-$250
352GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 30 30 29 32 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
22.9% Poor
Read 49.9
Write 36.9
Mixed 41.3
SusWrite 29.7
29% 39.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
79% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 M378B5773DH0-CH9 Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G M378B5773DH0-CH9 14GB
1333, 1333, 1600, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 8192, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.3% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 14.8
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 15.2
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 86.9
46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 4,522 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback