Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	31.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING (all builds)
Memory	21.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190108
Uptime	5.5 Days
Run Date	Dec 10 '21 at 19:41
Run Duration	270 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	57%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$120 142,983 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	59.5% Above average	Memory 63.1 1-Core 92.8 2-Core 174 62% 110 Pts	4-Core 311 8-Core 382 45% 347 Pts	64-Core 654 40% 654 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 3351) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.09 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	31.1% Below average	Lighting 40.6 Reflection 45.3 Parallax 33.7 33% 39.9 fps	MRender 36 Gravity 40.5 Splatting 26.6 27% 34.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Pcie SSD 256GB 15,792 User benchmarks, average bench 152% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: E8FM12.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 238 126 31 37 45 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	55.3% Above average	Read 300 Write 215 Mixed 226 SusWrite 119 48% 215 MB/s	4K Read 16.6 4K Write 42.2 4K Mixed 18 71% 25.6 MB/s	DQ Read 400 DQ Write 259 DQ Mixed 310 236% 323 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 214%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56 127,507 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 191GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 74 66 70 71 71 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	34.7% Below average	Read 50 Write 89.2 Mixed 51.2 SusWrite 70.8 48% 65.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 70%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 387GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 154 151 156 155 156 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	79.6% Very good	Read 124 Write 108 Mixed 70 SusWrite 154 83% 114 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 202% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 32GB 122 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	53.2% Above average	MC Read 19.9 MC Write 18.3 MC Mixed 20.7 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 14 SC Mixed 14.4 39% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 119 34% 119 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 114%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Battleship

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	174x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	172x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	135x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	246x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	185x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	156x

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $667

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16