Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	75.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400S-$70 10,987 User benchmarks, average bench 60% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	66.6% Good	Memory 87 1-Core 70.3 2-Core 131 60% 96.2 Pts	4-Core 269 8-Core 274 36% 272 Pts	64-Core 271 17% 271 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Zotac(19DA 730B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.78 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	5.15% Terrible	Lighting 6.3 Reflection 4.7 Parallax 7.8 5% 6.27 fps	MRender 3.9 Gravity 7.3 Splatting 7.2 5% 6.13 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.15% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Geonix 120GB 120GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0707B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 379 383 374 108 95 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	75.5% Very good	Read 442 Write 368 Mixed 348 SusWrite 285 81% 361 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 60.2 4K Mixed 22.9 99% 36.1 MB/s	DQ Read 151 DQ Write 324 DQ Mixed 41.8 88% 172 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905471-001.A01LF 99P5471-002.A01LF 4GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	49.2% Average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 19.2 MC Mixed 14.5 50% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 13.5 35% 12.4 GB/s	Latency 70.5 57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	766x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	324x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	303x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	67x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 7,511 samples	60x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 4x4GBHynixBench 48%, 2,925 samples	60x

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $219

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16