Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 339A
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121029
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 29 '21 at 19:30
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$69
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 69.3
1-Core 89.3
2-Core 165
62% 108 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 354
44% 333 Pts
64-Core 353
22% 353 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
HP(103C 339A) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.38% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 0.7
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.2 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.38%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSA2BW080G3H 512GB
339GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0424A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 54 16 78 40 136 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.7% Below average
Read 450
Write 412
Mixed 400
SusWrite 114
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 12.3
4K Mixed 0.6
37% 10.9 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 21
DQ Mixed 1
22% 57.5 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.8% Poor
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 8.7
28% 9.97 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 9.3
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6300 SFF Builds (Compare 3,226 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback