Toshiba dynabook R634/M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 76% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemToshiba dynabook R634/M  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA dynabook R634/M
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150902
Uptime20.8 Days
Run DateNov 29 '21 at 03:36
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU7%
CPU Throttled 76%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4510U
Socket BGA1168, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 95.9
1-Core 83.4
2-Core 32.4
54% 70.6 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 200
26% 194 Pts
64-Core 199
12% 199 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 0005) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5070
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.5% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 5.2
2% 3.4 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 2
Splatting 3.5
2% 2.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.5%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZMTE128HMGR-00005 128GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT4400Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 47 57 49 43 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 298
Write 85.9
Mixed 99.1
SusWrite 50.3
29% 133 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 33.3
4K Mixed 18.3
51% 19.3 MB/s
DQ Read 325
DQ Write 75.7
DQ Mixed 29.4
66% 143 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
27.6% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 7.6
24% 8.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 8
19% 6.57 GB/s
Latency 54.4
74% 54.4 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical dynabook R634/M Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba dynabook R634/M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback