HP Z620 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Z620 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 158A
Memory	109.2 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191029
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Nov 25 '21 at 08:53
Run Duration	287 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 4,306 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	36.3% Below average	Memory 49.5 1-Core 31.2 2-Core 62.4 31% 47.7 Pts	4-Core 125 8-Core 246 22% 186 Pts	64-Core 879 54% 879 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 71%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 379 Write 352 Mixed 290 76% 340 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 18.4 4K Mixed 16 52% 16.2 MB/s	DQ Read 145 DQ Write 111 DQ Mixed 106 86% 121 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
GOODRAM 960GB 288 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 111GB free Firmware: SAFM12.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 282 285 303 258 187 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	52.3% Above average	Read 398 Write 371 Mixed 329 SusWrite 265 76% 341 MB/s	4K Read 13.5 4K Write 17 4K Mixed 13.8 47% 14.8 MB/s	DQ Read 146 DQ Write 108 DQ Mixed 108 86% 121 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 113%
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129 14,996 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 231GB free Firmware: DXM06B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 177 178 184 125 109 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.4% Below average	Read 184 Write 222 Mixed 209 SusWrite 158 44% 193 MB/s	4K Read 13.7 4K Write 17.6 4K Mixed 15 49% 15.4 MB/s	DQ Read 113 DQ Write 113 DQ Mixed 102 80% 110 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 118%
C400-MTFDDAA512MAM 512GB 299GB free Firmware: 04TH SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 157 176 186 182 186 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.4% Below average	Read 230 Write 213 Mixed 203 SusWrite 175 46% 205 MB/s	4K Read 11.6 4K Write 17.9 4K Mixed 12.3 43% 13.9 MB/s	DQ Read 145 DQ Write 89.6 DQ Mixed 51.5 56% 95.5 MB/s

SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 211GB free Firmware: Z22000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 112 108 114 112 112 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.2% Poor	Read 121 Write 97.2 Mixed 107 SusWrite 112 25% 109 MB/s	4K Read 11 4K Write 15.4 4K Mixed 9.5 37% 12 MB/s	DQ Read 91.8 DQ Write 97.4 DQ Mixed 60.4 55% 83.2 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 86%
Toshiba THNSNF128GCSS 128GB 2,061 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 42GB free Firmware: N102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 190 75 73 145 176 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.1% Below average	Read 217 Write 93.9 Mixed 224 SusWrite 145 38% 170 MB/s	4K Read 13.5 4K Write 18.5 4K Mixed 16.7 52% 16.2 MB/s	DQ Read 146 DQ Write 93.8 DQ Mixed 108 84% 116 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 90%
C400-MTFDDAA512MAM 512GB 464GB free Firmware: 04TH SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 181 207 218 215 214 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	43% Average	Read 232 Write 224 Mixed 212 SusWrite 203 49% 218 MB/s	4K Read 13.1 4K Write 22.2 4K Mixed 14.9 51% 16.7 MB/s	DQ Read 131 DQ Write 121 DQ Mixed 50.5 59% 101 MB/s

Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$120 2,225 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 2.5TB free Firmware: AR17 SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 46 45 46 45 47 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	17.5% Very poor	Read 13.9 Write 21.4 Mixed 37.8 SusWrite 45.9 22% 29.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 0.3 118% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70BH0-YH9 8x16GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 8 of 12 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	33.5% Below average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 10.3 MC Mixed 14.3 38% 13.2 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 3.8 12% 4.3 GB/s	Latency 162 25% 162 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z620 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,401 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

System: HP Z620 Workstation

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	150x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples	147x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	129x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	170x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	113x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	95x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	72x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	68x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	60x

RAM
9965525-138.A00LF 12x8GBKingstonBench 111%, 25 samples	24x
18JDF1G72PZ-1G6E1 8x8GBMicronBench 97%, 23 samples	20x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 83%, 405 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $345

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16