QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics49.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory22.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 22.5GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory16.3 GB free of 22.5 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '21 at 01:56
Run Duration297 Seconds
Run User LVA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Six-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 5 cores, 10 threads
Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Memory 80.7
1-Core 119
2-Core 236
81% 145 Pts
4-Core 437
8-Core 649
68% 543 Pts
64-Core 728
45% 728 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.8% Average
Lighting 60.6
Reflection 64.5
Parallax 59.7
49% 61.6 fps
MRender 62.7
Gravity 64.2
Splatting 59.7
51% 62.2 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 322GB
238GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 418 428 441 228 273 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 65%
Red Hat VirtIO 512GB
179GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 523 450 126 104 105 102 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 38% Great: 85%
Red Hat VirtIO 859GB
566GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 136 102 102 102 154 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 22GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 6656 MB
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 43
MC Write 37.6
MC Mixed 35
110% 38.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 27
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 104%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback