Pcspecialist Studio Pro

Performance Results


Gaming 87% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 87% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	90.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Pcspecialist Studio Pro (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK TUF GAMING X570-PLUS
Memory	51.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210320
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Nov 12 '21 at 15:47
Run Duration	242 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$295 141,122 User benchmarks, average bench 87% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	93.3% Outstanding	Memory 78.4 1-Core 150 2-Core 299 94% 176 Pts	4-Core 579 8-Core 958 94% 769 Pts	64-Core 1,438 89% 1,438 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 93.3% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Zotac(19DA 4520) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing below potential (63^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	90.4% Outstanding	Lighting 113 Reflection 109 Parallax 110 92% 111 fps	MRender 135 Gravity 101 Splatting 92 87% 109 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 90.4% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
1TB PCS PCIe M.2 SSD 1TB 840 User benchmarks, average bench 208% 638GB free (System drive) Firmware: U0514A0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1233 1078 875 461 196 292 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	221% Outstanding	Read 2,180 Write 1,257 Mixed 1121 SusWrite 689 291% 1,312 MB/s	4K Read 48.5 4K Write 162 4K Mixed 32.5 201% 81.1 MB/s	DQ Read 743 DQ Write 782 DQ Mixed 513 454% 679 MB/s
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 221% Great: 287%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB 13,039 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 748GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	20.7% Poor	Read 42.1 Write 40.2 Mixed 40.9 SusWrite 39.6 9% 40.7 MB/s	4K Read 13.9 4K Write 15.6 4K Mixed 14.7 48% 14.7 MB/s	DQ Read 36.5 DQ Write 33.8 DQ Mixed 34.8 26% 35 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 20.7% Great: 99%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB 13,039 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 491GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 375 376 378 378 377 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	90.8% Outstanding	Read 407 Write 375 Mixed 363 SusWrite 376 86% 380 MB/s	4K Read 32.6 4K Write 63.4 4K Mixed 41.2 136% 45.7 MB/s	DQ Read 236 DQ Write 175 DQ Mixed 196 149% 202 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 90.8% Great: 99%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 2TB 2,362 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 218 217 219 216 214 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	64.8% Good	Read 370 Write 365 Mixed 321 SusWrite 217 72% 318 MB/s	4K Read 22.2 4K Write 39.4 4K Mixed 27.8 90% 29.8 MB/s	DQ Read 216 DQ Write 170 DQ Mixed 200 148% 196 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 199 199 199 200 199 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Hitachi G-DRIVE with Thu 4TB 79 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 1TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 97 97 95 97 98 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	54.3% Above average	Read 92.4 Write 97 Mixed 17.5 SusWrite 96.6 55% 75.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 95%
WD Elements 25A3 14TB 1,201 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 1.5TB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 95 96 96 98 99 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	60.5% Good	Read 102 Write 107 Mixed 128 SusWrite 96.4 150% 108 MB/s	4K Read 9.4 4K Write 7.3 4K Mixed 1.6 338% 6.1 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CM4X16GE2666Z16K4 4x16GB 84 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	77% Very good	MC Read 31 MC Write 19.8 MC Mixed 31.2 78% 27.3 GB/s	SC Read 22.1 SC Write 19.9 SC Mixed 32.2 71% 24.7 GB/s	Latency 83.5 48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 154%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Studio Pro Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 210%

UFO

Desktop 114%

UFO

Workstation 244%

UFO

System: Pcspecialist Studio Pro

CPU
Core i9-12900FIntel $495Bench 113%, 1,540 samples	2x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $260Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1x

GPU
RTX 4070Nvidia $539Bench 190%, 45,585 samples	2x
RTX 3060Nvidia $255Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	1x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	1x

SSD
990 PRO with Heatsink 2TBSamsungBench 440%, 3,821 samples	2x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $80Bench 341%, 58,572 samples	1x
PCS PCIe M.2 SSD 512GB512gbBench 185%, 4,059 samples	1x

RAM
CM4X16GC3200C16K4 2x16GBCorsairBench 95%, 2,261 samples	1x
CMWX16GC3200C16W2E 4x16GBCorsairBench 104%, 243 samples	1x
2x16GBAdataBench 87%, 5,790 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 90% - Excellent

Total price: $1,034

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16