Today's hottest deals

Samsung 305V4A/305V5A/3415VA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemSamsung 305V4A/305V5A/3415VA  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG 305V4A/305V4A
Memory2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20121023
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 25 '17 at 13:00
Run Duration98 Seconds
Run User EST-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-3430MX APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
45.1% Average
Memory 70
1-Core 37.6
2-Core 75.4
40% 61 Pts
4-Core 120
8-Core 119
16% 120 Pts
64-Core 120
7% 120 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6520G
Sanyo(144D C609) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
2.7% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 4.42
Parallax 2.56
3% 3.4 fps
MRender 3.67
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.43
3% 3.4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.7%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400 2.5" 320GB-$35
264GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001SDM1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 81.4
Write 75.9
Mixed 75.7
58% 77.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.28
60% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CK0 M471B5773CHS-CH9 4GB
1600, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.5% Below average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 10.2
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 7.7
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 101
39% 101 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 305V4A/305V5A/3415VA Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 305V4A/305V5A/3415VA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback