TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

American 5.11

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive80.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAmerican 5.11  (all builds)
MotherboardQIYIDA X99-H9
Memory28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210311
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 02 '21 at 15:49
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2649 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 94.3
1-Core 90.6
2-Core 180
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 718
63% 535 Pts
64-Core 1,190
74% 1,190 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑
This bench: 79.9%
 Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Zotac(19DA 1476) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 460.79
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Lighting 18.2
Reflection 18.3
Parallax 18.7
15% 18.4 fps
MRender 16.1
Gravity 19.3
Splatting 17.1
14% 17.5 fps
Poor: 11% ↑
This bench: 14.7%
 Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Eksata 120G K100 120GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1026A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 230 218 174 182 130 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 492
Write 263
Mixed 277
SusWrite 185
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 86.2
4K Mixed 38.1
138% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 76.9
DQ Mixed 177
127% 168 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑
This bench: 80.7%
 Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GR7BFR4C-RD Samsung M393B1G70BH0-YK0 HMT41GR7BFR4C-RD Samsung M393B1G70BH0-YK0 32GB
1867, 1600, 1867, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
108% Outstanding
MC Read 50.4
MC Write 39
MC Mixed 36.7
120% 42 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 20.3
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 59
68% 59 ns
Poor: 108% ↑
This bench: 108%
 Great: 112%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 5.11 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: American 5.11

CPU
Xeon E5-2673 v3IntelBench 70%, 592 samples3x
Xeon E5-2640 v3IntelBench 71%, 3,267 samples3x
Xeon E5-2649 v3IntelBench 72%, 28 samples2x
GPU
GeForce GTS 450NvidiaBench 7%, 25,436 samples3x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia  $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples2x
HD 7950AMD  $290Bench 29%, 33,820 samples1x
SSD
120G K100 120GBEksataBench 85%, 11 samples2x
256GB 256GBNetacBench 67%, 2,108 samples2x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples1x
RAM
HMA41GR7MFR4N-TF 1x8GBHynixBench 35%, 177 samples3x
99U5471-023.A00LF 99U5471-023.A00LF KRE-D3U1600M/4G KRE-D3U1600M/4G 16GBUnknownBench 91%, 2 samples2x
HMT41GR7BFR4C-RD Samsung M393B1G70BH0-YK0 HMT41GR7BFR4C-RD Samsung M393B1G70BH0-YK0 32GBHynixBench 110%, 4 samples2x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback