Today's hottest deals

Asus M3A-H/HDMI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics8.82% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M3A-H/HDMI  (all builds)
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110124
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 31 '21 at 10:08
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom 9850
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Memory 53.8
1-Core 36.2
2-Core 70.5
34% 53.5 Pts
4-Core 101
8-Core 130
15% 115 Pts
64-Core 116
7% 116 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5750
XFX(1682 2982) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
8.82% Terrible
Lighting 11.7
Reflection 12.3
Parallax 10.5
10% 11.5 fps
MRender 10.1
Gravity 9.1
Splatting 8.4
7% 9.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.82%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
169GB free
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 169 176 200 203 205 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.5% Below average
Read 145
Write 140
Mixed 142
SusWrite 182
34% 152 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 30.1
4K Mixed 9.6
49% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 26
DQ Write 62.9
DQ Mixed 17.5
21% 35.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 100%
Hitachi HDT721032SLA360 320GB-$26
219GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ST2OA3AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 19 11 15 40 42 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 32
Write 40
Mixed 18.2
SusWrite 25.1
21% 28.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.6
29% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
15.8% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 5.2
15% 5.2 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.37 GB/s
Latency 147
27% 147 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 21.5" 1280 720 ACI22C3 ASUS VP228
Typical M3A-H/HDMI Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M3A-H/HDMI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback