Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Samsung R520/R522/R620

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 21% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	3.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Samsung R520/R522/R620 (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG R520/R522/R620
Memory	0.7 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090803
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 31 '21 at 08:22
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T6400-$130 4,995 User benchmarks, average bench 34% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	Memory 48.9 1-Core 27.5 2-Core 45.1 28% 40.5 Pts	4-Core 50.5 8-Core 50.3 7% 50.4 Pts	64-Core 52.8 3% 52.8 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 4,405 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Sanyo(144D C050) 1GB Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	3.77% Terrible	Lighting 4.4 Reflection 7.1 Parallax 5 4% 5.5 fps	MRender 4.7 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 6.1 4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.77% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$15 42,987 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 127GB free (System drive) Firmware: 11.01A11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 10 17 13 14 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	5.49% Terrible	Read 6.5 Write 5.5 Mixed 6.5 SusWrite 12.7 6% 7.8 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 5.49% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 1024, 2048 MB Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	12.8% Very poor	MC Read 5.1 MC Write 3.7 MC Mixed 3.8 12% 4.2 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 3.1 9% 3.17 GB/s	Latency 165 24% 165 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 23%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical R520/R522/R620 Builds (Compare 63 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 36%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung R520/R522/R620

CPU
Core2 Duo T6400Intel $130Bench 34%, 4,995 samples	12x
Core2 Duo P8700Intel $42Bench 37%, 7,366 samples	11x
Core2 Duo P7450Intel $90Bench 36%, 2,755 samples	10x

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 4650ATIBench 3%, 4,405 samples	38x
Mobility Radeon HD 4300ATIBench 1%, 2,791 samples	21x
Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset FamilyIntelBench 0%, 23,924 samples	3x

SSD
INTENSO 120GBBench 70%, 652 samples	3x
128GB 128GBNetacBench 58%, 1,666 samples	2x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	2x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	50x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	7x
1x2GBUnknownBench 17%, 99,586 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 42% - Average

Total price: $130

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060 $285	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320