HP 500-426nc

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics7.65% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive54.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 500-426nc  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B17
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141023
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 29 '21 at 20:59
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Memory 48.7
1-Core 55.8
2-Core 111
41% 71.7 Pts
4-Core 159
8-Core 176
22% 167 Pts
64-Core 171
11% 171 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Device(1B0A 90DF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.65% Terrible
Lighting 9.7
Reflection 10.7
Parallax 13.5
8% 11.3 fps
MRender 8.2
Gravity 10.3
Splatting 8
7% 8.83 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.65%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$35
233GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 234 81 5.6 5.8 7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 448
Write 229
Mixed 221
SusWrite 91.2
55% 247 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 68.2
4K Mixed 12.6
80% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 34.5
65% 130 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.9% Very poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 6.2
18% 6.33 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 6.6
17% 5.93 GB/s
Latency 166
24% 166 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-426nc Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP 500-426nc

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 29% - Poor Total price: $35
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback