Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H DDR3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	28.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Gigabyte H110M-S2H DDR3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H DDR3-CF (all builds)
Memory	6.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180412
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 28 '21 at 05:13
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	38%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-7100-$70 79,299 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	55.4% Above average	Memory 66.1 1-Core 103 2-Core 167 64% 112 Pts	4-Core 258 8-Core 269 35% 263 Pts	64-Core 297 18% 297 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 8613) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.1% Poor	Lighting 35.5 Reflection 38.8 Parallax 36.8 29% 37 fps	MRender 37.3 Gravity 36.7 Splatting 25.6 26% 33.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3FD6SD SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 212 55 78 102 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	61.3% Good	Read 401 Write 369 Mixed 312 SusWrite 118 67% 300 MB/s	4K Read 6.3 4K Write 61.8 4K Mixed 29.6 80% 32.6 MB/s	DQ Read 284 DQ Write 259 DQ Mixed 129 136% 224 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 344GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 149 148 149 150 148 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	88.2% Excellent	Read 159 Write 166 Mixed 79.6 SusWrite 148 101% 138 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 88.2% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905471-009.A00LF 12GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34.7% Below average	MC Read 11.8 MC Write 12.8 MC Mixed 11.3 34% 12 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 11.2 SC Mixed 11 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H110M-S2H DDR3-CF Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H DDR3-CF

CPU
Core i3-6100Intel $66Bench 55%, 110,166 samples	16x
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	14x
Pentium G4560Intel $31Bench 57%, 70,054 samples	11x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	9x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	7x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	7x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	7x
P3-256 256GBBench 69%, 2,367 samples	6x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	7x
99U5471-034.FCDT 0194 SH564128FH8N0QHSCR 8GBKingstonBench 50%, 9 samples	5x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $94

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16