Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 153%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 157%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics188% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive453% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210809
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 22 '21 at 15:06
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Memory 78.9
1-Core 145
2-Core 271
90% 165 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 805
76% 627 Pts
64-Core 1,386
86% 1,386 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$909
Asus(1043 8822) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
188% Outstanding
Lighting 274
Reflection 241
Parallax 298
223% 271 fps
MRender 305
Gravity 229
Splatting 167
184% 234 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 188%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP1000GM30002 1TB
837GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STNSC014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3261 3345 3766 3842 3932 3870 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
453% Outstanding
Read 2,149
Write 3,504
Mixed 2,133
SusWrite 3669
651% 2,864 MB/s
4K Read 50.8
4K Write 200
4K Mixed 87
294% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,313
DQ Write 994
DQ Mixed 1,155
863% 1,154 MB/s
Poor: 177%
This bench: 453%
Great: 492%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56
245GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 60 62 62 62 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 67.6
Write 106
Mixed 53.9
SusWrite 62.4
53% 72.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 70%
Generic Mass Storage 1GB
1GB free, PID 0005
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 9.1 9.1 9.1 9.1 9.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
6.53% Terrible
Read 17.5
Write 8.7
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 9.1
14% 11.1 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
34% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.53%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
MC Read 38.2
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 38.3
99% 34.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.6
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 38.3
85% 29.9 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,851 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,032
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback