Samsung 950QED

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	12.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	420% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

CPU throttled at 67% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Samsung 950QED (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG SAMSUNG_NP950QED
Memory	3.3 GB free of 8 GB
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20211012
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 21 '21 at 08:04
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	2%
CPU Throttled	67%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
12th Gen Intel Core i5-1250P 2 User benchmarks, average bench 81% U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	89.3% Excellent	Memory 54.7 1-Core 202 2-Core 394 108% 217 Pts	4-Core 703 8-Core 747 96% 725 Pts	64-Core 884 55% 884 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 89.3% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 72,765 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Sanyo(144D C1AC) 1GB Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.100.9782 Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	12.8% Very poor	Lighting 13.3 Reflection 20.8 Parallax 16.2 11% 16.8 fps	MRender 19.3 Gravity 26.3 Splatting 16.6 17% 20.7 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 21%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00B 1TB 283 User benchmarks, average bench 359% 873GB free (System drive) Firmware: GXA7CK2Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 3100 3150 2901 2451 1614 1677 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	420% Outstanding	Read 2,640 Write 2,995 Mixed 2,735 SusWrite 2,482 613% 2,713 MB/s	4K Read 80.2 4K Write 184 4K Mixed 111 362% 125 MB/s	DQ Read 1,455 DQ Write 798 DQ Mixed 1,276 909% 1,176 MB/s
Poor: 221% ↑ This bench: 420% Great: 447%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8x1GB 283 User benchmarks, average bench 115% 8 of 8 slots used 8GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4400 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	54.6% Above average	MC Read 24.8 MC Write 16.4 MC Mixed 19.5 58% 20.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 17 SC Mixed 15.3 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 144 28% 144 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 142%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 950QED Builds (Compare 254 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

System: Samsung 950QED

CPU
Core i7-1260PIntelBench 85%, 4,690 samples	236x
Core i5-1240PIntelBench 83%, 2,059 samples	17x
Gen Intel Core i5-1250P12thBench 81%, 2 samples	1x

GPU
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 16%, 72,765 samples	242x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	3x
Titan X PascalNvidia $286Bench 121%, 8,692 samples	2x

SSD
MZVLQ512HBLU-00B 512GBSamsungBench 165%, 1,221 samples	91x
MZVLQ1T0HBLB-00B 1TBSamsungBench 205%, 395 samples	51x
SDBPNPZ-512G-1004 512GBSn530Bench 191%, 222 samples	44x

RAM
K3LKBKB@BM-MGCP 8x2GBSamsungBench 116%, 4,018 samples	224x
8x1GBMicronBench 115%, 283 samples	24x
K3LKCKC@BM-MGCP 8x4GBSamsungBench 129%, 524 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16