Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 155%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 144%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics153% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 16 '21 at 18:27
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$160
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 95.7
1-Core 160
2-Core 310
103% 188 Pts
4-Core 584
8-Core 983
95% 784 Pts
64-Core 1,161
72% 1,161 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 102%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$450
Asus(1043 87C1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
153% Outstanding
Lighting 225
Reflection 210
Parallax 201
183% 212 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 157
Splatting 141
131% 164 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 153%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,529
Write 2,350
Mixed 1,380
463% 2,086 MB/s
4K Read 66.7
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 88.7
303% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,248
DQ Write 922
DQ Mixed 1,057
798% 1,076 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
251GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 486 469 464 463 439 427 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 466
Write 437
Mixed 424
SusWrite 458
101% 446 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 62.9
206% 74.6 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 364
274% 366 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 127%
Great: 133%
Corsair Force LE 240GB-$85
75GB free
Firmware: SAFC12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 133 173 125 173 174 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 488
Mixed 396
SusWrite 208
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 43.5
164% 61.3 MB/s
DQ Read 325
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 200
189% 292 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 97%
Seagate 600 240GB-$215
127GB free
Firmware: C675
SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 420 360 396 350 360 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 443
Mixed 337
SusWrite 390
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 98.3
4K Mixed 38.4
144% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 344
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 253
213% 308 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 103%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 029E CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 029E CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 029E CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 38.7
MC Write 40
MC Mixed 31.6
105% 36.8 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 46.4
SC Mixed 32
96% 33.5 GB/s
Latency 55
73% 55 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 104%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 5-CF Builds (Compare 3,648 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 - $226

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 116% - Outstanding Total price: $780
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $367
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback