Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 21% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	2.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Embedded G-Series GX-420GI Radeon R7E 191 User benchmarks, average bench 31% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	19% Very poor	Memory 27.6 1-Core 13.3 2-Core 48.9 18% 29.9 Pts	4-Core 59.9 8-Core 67.9 8% 63.9 Pts	64-Core 78.1 5% 78.1 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 19% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7E Graphics 168 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 8158) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.45.01.23 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	2.21% Terrible	Lighting 2.5 Reflection 3.9 Parallax 3.1 2% 3.17 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 2.8 Splatting 3.3 2% 3.07 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.21% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SN8U-128G-1006 128GB 10,347 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 91GB free (System drive) Firmware: X4120006 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 90 92 90 90 91 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	39.2% Below average	Read 310 Write 160 Mixed 168 SusWrite 94.2 40% 183 MB/s	4K Read 13.9 4K Write 23.7 4K Mixed 13 50% 16.9 MB/s	DQ Read 154 DQ Write 103 DQ Mixed 111 87% 123 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 89%
PSSBN032GA27MC0 32GB 30GB free Firmware: SBFH00A8 SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 9.2 5.4 10 9.2 9.2 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 2x4GB 26,973 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	24.5% Poor	MC Read 9.7 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 10.3 26% 9.1 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 7 17% 5.97 GB/s	Latency 269 15% 269 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 71%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 33%

Sail boat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

CPU
Embedded G-Series GX-420GI Radeon R7EAMDBench 31%, 191 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon R7E GraphicsAMDBench 2%, 168 samples	2x

SSD
SD8SN8U-128G-1006 128GBSandiskBench 66%, 10,347 samples	2x

RAM
HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 2x4GBHynixBench 57%, 26,973 samples	1x
M471A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GBSamsungBench 32%, 40,829 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16