Today's hottest deals

Asus K61IC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus K61IC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K61IC
Memory1.7 GB free of 3 GB @ 2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100528
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 12 '21 at 21:26
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 80%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium T4300
Socket 478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Memory 35.5
1-Core 22.5
2-Core 40.5
22% 32.8 Pts
4-Core 34.8
8-Core 42.9
5% 38.8 Pts
64-Core 43.8
3% 43.8 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 220M
Asus(1043 202D) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.57% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 0.9
2% 2.3 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.5
2% 2.3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.57%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS543232L9A 320GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FB4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 20 22 21 23 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Read 42.9
Write 24.7
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 21.3
20% 27.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
MC Read 3.8
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 3.4
11% 3.73 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 2.7
7% 2.47 GB/s
Latency 224
18% 224 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K61IC Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K61IC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 8% - Terrible Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback